|
Pages
of the Complaint
|
incriminating statements. Id. at 434. Relying on the extra caution to
be given to juvenile admissions as suggested by Re Gault and the concern
of the legislature in drafting the juvenile code to protect the rights
of accused juveniles, the court of appeals found the statements inadmissible.
Id.
C. Under the totality of the circumstances in Aarons case, his oral
statements to Officer Boggs and Detective Eastham were not voluntary.
This inexperienced, immature fifteen-year-old child was visibly distraught,
covered in his own brothers blood, and strategically separated from
is parents. (TAPE No. 047; 7/13/00; 10:46:37 - 10:48:08, 10:51:55 - 10:54:21;
TAPE No. 078-2; 12/14/00; 12:04:40 - 12:04:57)
No effort was made by the police to contact the parents, even though the
police knew that the parents were at the hospital. (TAPE No. 047; 7/31/00;
10:51:19 - 10:51:36) In addition, Sergeant Eastham urged Aaron
to come clean for the sake of his brother and mother.
(TAPE No. 047; 7/31/00; 10:53:42 - 10:54:21; TAPE No. 078-2; 12/14/00;
11:55:19 - 11:55:27, 12:04:10 - 12:04:37)
D. Although Aaron may not have initially been a suspect, the tenor of
the interview changed drastically when no evidence of a drive-by shooting
was found. At this time, Officer Boggs claimed that he advised Aaron of
his Miranda rights. (TAPE No. 047; 7/31/00; 10:24:01 - 10:28:05) Although
Officer Boggs theorized that Aaron was not in custody until that point,
Aaron was never advised that he was free to leave. (Id.) In fact Aaron
thought the police would eventually take him to the hospital to see his
brother. Further, no attempts were made to contact the parents when Aarons
status changed from a mere witness to a full-fledged suspect. Nor were
the parents advised that Aaron was being taken to headquarters for a taped
statement.
E. On Dec. 29, 1999, two days after the shooting, Officer Kent Jones,
a traffic officer with the Louisville Police Department, submitted a very
suspicious statement to the Police. This statement was wrongfully taken,
by Detective Julius Clark, as a report and entered into the police records.
Here, Officer Jones falsely
stated that he knew that >>>
- 19 -
<<< previous
page | next page >>>
| HOME | return
to: Index of Issues & Letters |
| How
to Participate |
| Disclaimer
| Contacts | Related
Links |
|