The Hardin Family Lawsuit against Commonwealth of KY., et al; filed May 14, 2003; Page 5

Pages of the Complaint

1
3
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
31
33
35
37
39
41
43
45
47
49
51
53
55
57
59
61
63
65
67
69
71
73
75

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS, Cont’


• Judge Shake Wrongfully Denied Aaron’s Motion for
   a Directed Verdict and Judgment Notwithstanding the
   Verdict Where the Evidence was Insufficient to Sustain a
   Finding of Wanton Conduct, Even based on the
   Standard of a Reasonable Adult

• Judge Shake Wrongfully Permitted the Commonwealth
   to Display Inaccurate, Inflammatory, Irrelevant
   Photographs, and Crime Scene Video Footage to
   the Jury

• Judge Shake Wrongfully Condoned Several Prejudicial
   Comments Made by the Commonwealth
   During its Closing Argument of
   the Penalty Phase.

• During the Trial, Judge Shake Compelled Aaron to
   Hold the gun, In Unconstitutionally Forcing
   Him to Again Incriminate Himself

• The Jurors Witnessed the Many Motions and
   Objections from Aaron’s Attorney, and
   how Judge Shake Continuously Ruled
   Against Aaron

• The Destruction of Aaron’s Life

• Judge Shake Inadvertently Admits to
   the Innocence of Aaron

       OFFENSES:

• Count 1 – Commonwealth Prosecutors Intended and
      Conspired to Secure the Illegal June 4th, 2002
      Probation Agreement. This, minimally,
      is a violation under 18 U.S.C. § 241,
      conspiracy to prevent rights

• Count 2 – Commonwealth Prosecutors and
      James M. Shake Intended to Violate Aaron’s
      Rights, to Secure the Illegal June 4th, 2002 >>>

Paragraphs       


21 – 21C      
         



22 – 22-H




23 – 23-D




24




25 – 25-B

26 – 26-I


27 – 27-F







28 – 32

Page



33




35




38




41




41

42


44







46



48

- 5 -

<<< previous page | next page >>>

| HOME | return to: Index of Issues & Letters |

| How to Participate |

| Disclaimer | Contacts | Related Links |